Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come

 
View related threads: (in this forum | in all forums)

Logged in as: Guest
Users viewing this topic: none
  Printable Version
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Prophecy & End Times >> RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come - 3/9/2010 1:32:08 AM   
bob97


Posts: 1203
Joined: 6/24/2006
From: Kansas
Status: offline
I concur Stromcrow, Luke 21:20 does seem to identify the time of the desolation that Mat 24 eludes to.

In Messiah,

Bob

_____________________________

The LORD clears the road for me!
The LORD is my high ridge, my stronghold, my deliverer!
Post #: 251
RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come - 3/9/2010 10:31:56 PM   
Retrobyter


Posts: 765
Joined: 8/23/2007
From: Florida
Status: online
Shalom, Bob.

quote:

ORIGINAL: bob97

Marv, just to make my position clear; I have always been one who seen the 70th week as be future. Suddenly lately it started to have some holes, actually has always had some holes because much of the prophecy we read seems to have many aspects that were historical. As an example much of Mat 24 seems to have already occurred and then there is Revelation and the seals which seem to be largely historical. Then there is Daniel 9:27, which I’ve always understood to be the antichrist that would make a covenant for the finial week. Then Roy started teaching that it was in fact Christ who made the covenant; at first I rejected that but now I agree. This opened up the question of the finial week to me, so I started to do research just to see when that theology came onto the scene. What I have posted is some of the things that I find that seem to ring true.

Another passage of scripture which I’ve always seen to be future has been 2 Thessalonians 2:4; this was always the antichrist setting in a new temple in the future. We have always had the argument about the new temple, some saying it would not happen and some saying that the temple of the future was in the hearts of believers, so this has always been an argument difficult to flesh out.

Now let me ask you a question…has there ever been in the past a person or several persons setting in the house of God whom have called themselves god or that they take Gods place on earth, or anyone with references to their deity. Anyone whom has the authority to grant salvation or condemn one to hell, a person whom is supreme without error? I think there has been and this is what Luther was referring to.

At this point I am only exploring some of these inconsistencies but I am starting to see another possibility.

In Messiah,

Bob


This is now my SIXTH attempt to respond to you! (Been having technical difficulties.)

I'm actually glad that you've come to recognize that the Mashiach is the One who CONFIRMED the covenant (not "MADE") with Isra'el, Dani'el's people. That's a HUGE step in itself.

HOWEVER, don't be misled into thinking that ALL of the passage has been fulfilled. There are some events which are predicted that have not yet been fulfilled and won't be until the Mashiach returns (as promised). The first three of the purposes for the 70 Septets (Sevens) were fulfilled when Yeshua` haMashiach came the first time. The second three of the purposes will be fulfilled when He returns.

First, it is HE who will bring in everlasting righteousness (Hebrew: "tsedeq `owlamiym," ;literally, "righteousness [of] ages"). This is promised Heb. 1:8-9; 2 Pet. 3:13; Rev. 19:8, 11; 21:3-4, 7, 22, 27.

Second, it is HE who will close up the vision (Hebrew: "vlachtom chaazown," literally, "and to close a sight"). As can be seen from Acts 2:17 quoted from Joel 2:28, visions and dreams are modes by which prophecies are communicated. We have several examples of visions in the NT: Luke 1:22; Matt. 17:9; Luke 24:23; Acts 9:10,12; 10:3, 17, 19; 11:5; 16:9, 10; 18:9; 26:19; II Cor. 12:1, and Rev. 9:17. But, prophecies will end when they are no longer needed. This is promised in I Cor. 13:8 and Hebrews 8:11 quoted from Jer. 31:34.

Third, it is HE who will anoint the Most Holy (Hebrew: "qodesh qaadaashiym," literally, the "Holy [of] Holies"). This is promised in Ezekiel 40-48.

I believe that some have seen that Yeshua` did indeed fulfill some of these six during His first coming; therefore, they ASSUME from the first three He fulfilled that He fulfilled them all. These become Preterist assuming that the rest of the prophecy has also been completely fulfilled.

Others have seen that not all of the six purposes were fulfilled in Yeshua`s first coming but that He WILL fulfill the rest when He comes again. These have graduated to Futurists or Premillennialists. And yet, it is important that premillennialists NOT FORGET that Yeshua` has already fulfilled the first three purposes in His first coming!

He has ALREADY "finished the transgression" (John 19:30; Rom. 4:1-25; 5:14-21; Heb. 2:2-4; I John 3:4), "made an end of sins" (I John 1:7-9; 2:1-3; 3:4-9), and "made reconciliation for iniquity" (II Cor. 5:17-21).

So, BOTH are true! Part has already been fulfilled, and part has not!

This applies to the book of Revelation and Yeshua`s "Olivet Discourse," as well. For instance, have we EVER in known human history had a meteorITE shower as predicted in Revelation 6:12-9:12?! This is NOT to be interpreted "spiritually" or "allegorically!" There's no call for interpreting it as anything but literal! If one can accept that Yeshua` will LITERALLY return to this earth, then we should also interpret His words literally, too!

Oh, and it is IMPORTANT ... VERY IMPORTANT ... that one recognizes that GOD IS NOT DONE WITH THE JEWS!!! They are the REASON for the "gap!" They are the REASON that Yeshua` put the Sevens on hold! Why are the Gentiles allowed to become part of the commonwealth of Isra'el? TO MAKE THE JEWS ENVIOUS!!! Why have they been persecuted over and over again (yet never too long or too hard at any one time to totally annihilate them) down through the last two millennia? IT'S BECAUSE OF THEIR MISTREATMENT OF GOD'S SON!!!

HOWEVER (thank God!), that's not the end of the story!

Rom 11:7-32
7 What then? What Israel sought so earnestly it did not obtain, but the elect did. The others were hardened, 8 as it is written:

"God gave them a spirit of stupor,
eyes so that they could not see
and ears so that they could not hear,
to this very day."

9 And David says:

"May their table become a snare and a trap,
a stumbling block and a retribution for them.
10 May their eyes be darkened so they cannot see,
and their backs be bent forever."

11 Again I ask: Did they stumble so as to fall beyond recovery? Not at all! Rather, because of their transgression, salvation has come to the Gentiles to make Israel envious. 12 But if their transgression means riches for the world, and their loss means riches for the Gentiles, how much greater riches will their fullness bring!

13 I am talking to you Gentiles. Inasmuch as I am the apostle to the Gentiles, I make much of my ministry 14 in the hope that I may somehow arouse my own people to envy and save some of them. 15 For if their rejection is the reconciliation of the world, what will their acceptance be but life from the dead? 16 If the part of the dough offered as firstfruits is holy, then the whole batch is holy; if the root is holy, so are the branches.

17 If some of the branches have been broken off, and you, though a wild olive shoot, have been grafted in among the others and now share in the nourishing sap from the olive root, 18 do not boast over those branches. If you do, consider this: You do not support the root, but the root supports you. 19 You will say then, "Branches were broken off so that I could be grafted in." 20 Granted. But they were broken off because of unbelief, and you stand by faith. Do not be arrogant, but be afraid. 21 For if God did not spare the natural branches, he will not spare you either.

22 Consider therefore the kindness and sternness of God: sternness to those who fell, but kindness to you, provided that you continue in his kindness. Otherwise, you also will be cut off. 23 And if they do not persist in unbelief, they will be grafted in, for God is able to graft them in again. 24 After all, if you were cut out of an olive tree that is wild by nature, and contrary to nature were grafted into a cultivated olive tree, how much more readily will these, the natural branches, be grafted into their own olive tree!

25 I do not want you to be ignorant of this mystery, brothers, so that you may not be conceited: Israel has experienced a hardening in part until the full number of the Gentiles has come in. 26 And so all Israel will be saved, as it is written:

"The deliverer will come from Zion;
he will turn godlessness away from Jacob.
27 And this is my covenant with them
when I take away their sins."

28 As far as the gospel is concerned, they are enemies on your account; but as far as election is concerned, they are loved on account of the patriarchs, 29 for God's gifts and his call are irrevocable. 30 Just as you who were at one time disobedient to God have now received mercy as a result of their disobedience, 31 so they too have now become disobedient in order that they too may now receive mercy as a result of God's mercy to you. 32 For God has bound all men over to disobedience so that he may have mercy on them all.
NIV


I hope you carefully weigh what I've tried to share with you here; I don't want to lose you to the "dark side" over partly accepting my teachings.

In the Messiah's love,
Roy

_____________________________

The avatar above is a Venn diagram of the Kingdom from the sky. Yeshua`s Kingdom is in green, both dark green and light green.
Post #: 252
RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come - 3/9/2010 11:59:54 PM   
Stormcrow

 

Posts: 587
Joined: 12/9/2007
Status: offline
No need to worry, Roy: the 70 weeks are completely fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD. The following is cross-posted from the "Revelation Question" thread:

Ntech...

The translators are wrong. Here, again, is the passage literally translated from the Greek with Strong's Reference numbers beside them:
quote:


|2532| And
|2784| will be proclaimed
|5124| this
|2098| Good News
|3588| of the
|0932| kingdom
|1722| in
|3680| all
|3588| the
|3625| inhabited earth
|1519| for
|3142| a testimony
|3956| to all
|3588| the
|1484| nations,
|2532| and
|5119| then
|2240| will come
|3588| the
|5156| end.

Strong's Ref. # 3625
Romanized oikoumene
Pronounced oy-kou-men'-ay

feminine participle present passive of GSN3611 (as noun, by implication of GSN1093); land, i.e. the (terrene part of the) globe; specifically, the Roman empire:
KJV--earth, world.


In doing further research on this word, I found the following:

quote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ecumene

Ecumene (also spelled œcumene or oikoumene) a term originally used in the Greco-Roman world to refer to the inhabited earth (or at least the known part of it). The term derives from the Greek οἰκουμένη (oikouménē, the feminine present middle participle of the verb οἰκέω, oikéō, "to inhabit"), short for οἰκουμένη γῆ "inhabited world".[1] In modern connotations it refers either to the projection of a united Christian Church or to world civilizations.

Over time, the word came to mean the civilized world, and to be synonymous with the Roman Empire. This usage continued after the division of the Empire into East and West, and the East Roman Emperors would use the term to describe their imperial administration. Constantinople itself came to be known as the "Ecumenical City". The word was adopted within Christianity, especially for Synods called by the Emperors and composed of bishops throughout the world (see Ecumenical Councils).


Bob97 had an excellent post about how this error crept first into Protestantism, then Evangelicalism:

quote:

Luther became convinced that the prophecies of Daniel were about the Roman Catholic Church and that Papal Rome was indeed the antichrist of the Bible prophecy. Hundreds of thousands of people left the RCC. In retaliation the RCC began a campaign to counter the claims of Luther at the Council of Trent. The Jesuits were commissioned by the Pope to develop a new interpretation of Scripture that would counteract the Protestant application of the RCC. Francisco Ribera, a Jesuit priest published a commentary on Revelation as a counter-interpretation in 1590. Ribera applied all of Revelation except the earliest chapters to the end time rather than to the history of the Church. Antichrist would be a single evil person who would be received by the Jews and would rebuild the temple. “Ribera denied the Protestant Scriptural Antichrist (2 Thessalonians 2) as seated in the church of God—asserted by Augustine, Jerome, Luther and many reformers. He set on an infidel Antichrist, outside the church of God.

For almost 300 years the Jesuit Futurism remained largely inside the RCC but in the 1800s the process of adoption into the Protestants began. There were many steps to this adoption but it really all came to a head with Nelson Darby when he became a strong promoter of a Pre-Tribulation Rapture followed by a one man antichrist; this teaching became the hallmark of Dispensationalist. It was Darby who laid much of the foundation for the present popular removal of Daniel’s 70th week away from history and applied it to a future tribulation after the rapture. Cyrus Ingerson Scofield later adopted the teaching of Darby into his Scofield Reference Bible and this doctrine became firmly established inside the 20th century American Church

These are the facts as I see them from my research.


While Bob's source deals mainly with the interpretation of Daniel 9, it applies to our discussion because Daniel 9 is specifically mentioned in Matt.24:15!

So the translators have been displaying a Jesuit bias when interpreting Matthew 24!

So look at the context of Matthew 24:14-22 again with the Greek properly translated and see if it doesn't make more sense:

quote:

And this gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the ROMAN EMPIRE (oikoumene) for a witness unto all nations; and then shall the TREMBLING (tromos) come.

When ye therefore shall see the abomination of desolation, spoken of by Daniel the prophet, stand in the holy place, (whoso readeth, let him understand:) Then let them which be in Judaea flee into the mountains: Let him which is on the housetop not come down to take any thing out of his house: Neither let him which is in the field return back to take his clothes.

And woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck in those days! But pray ye that your flight be not in the winter, neither on the sabbath day: For then shall be great tribulation (thlipsis), such as was not since the beginning of the world to this time, no, nor ever shall be.

And except those days should be shortened, there should no flesh be saved: but for the elect's sake those days shall be shortened. Matthew 24:14-22 (KJV)


And now, the parallel passage from Luke that interprets Matthew:

quote:

And when ye shall see Jerusalem compassed with armies, then know that the desolation thereof is nigh. Then let them which are in Judaea flee to the mountains; and let them which are in the midst of it depart out; and let not them that are in the countries enter thereinto.

For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

But woe unto them that are with child, and to them that give suck, in those days! for there shall be great distress in the land, and wrath upon this people. And they shall fall by the edge of the sword, and shall be led away captive into all nations: and Jerusalem shall be trodden down of the Gentiles, until the times of the Gentiles be fulfilled. Luke 21:20-24 (KJV)


In fact, despite my earlier contention that verses 4-9 of Matthew 24 coincided with the first 5 seals in Revelation 6, I am now willing to admit I may be wrong on that count (still evaluating this).

Furthermore, on those grounds, I believe Daniel's 70th week was finished in the destruction of Jerusalem and the desolation of Israel, as Luke wrote:

For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

None of this affects my earlier posts on the harmonization of the 6th Seal of Revelation 6 and 7 to Matthew 24:29-31 and 1 Thessalonians 4:16-17.

(Edited to remove absolute statements, as I am still working on this.)

Luke 21 interprets Matthew 24 for us. And what does Luke write again?

For these be the days of vengeance, that all things which are written may be fulfilled.

The destruction of Jerusalem completed God's wrath against Israel ("days of vengeance"). Israel was reborn in 1948, and Jerusalem was retaken in 1967, signaling the end of its being "trampled under foot by the gentiles."

Any further discussion of eschatology - I believe - needs to start with Israel's rebirth and Jerusalem's reoccupation by the Jews.
Post #: 253
RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come - 3/10/2010 10:08:57 AM   
ta_mosquito


Posts: 11824
Joined: 3/31/2005
From: from MN, now in Ontario :D
Status: offline
quote:

No need to worry, Roy: the 70 weeks are completely fulfilled with the destruction of Jerusalem in 70 AD.


If you are discussing Preterism, it must go in the Preterism one-stop thread.

Here is the link:
CLICK HERE

Please continue discussion there. Closing this thread.

If you feel this is in error, please email the forums admin per the text below.

Thanks!

Tricia
Forums Moderator

Please do not reply to this message within the forums or chat.

Please email Community@salemwebnetwork.com with questions, comments, or concerns.

Please do not send me PMs regarding this message.
Post #: 254
Page:   <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]
All Forums >> [Theology] >> Prophecy & End Times >> RE: Half the week is over; half is yet to come
Jump to post #:
Page: <<   < prev  7 8 9 10 [11]
Jump to:





New Messages No New Messages
Hot Topic w/ New Messages Hot Topic w/o New Messages
Locked w/ New Messages Locked w/o New Messages
 Post New Thread
 Reply to Message
 Post New Poll
 Submit Vote
 Delete My Own Post
 Delete My Own Thread
 Rate Posts



  Forum Tools
Forums |  Register |  Login |  My Profile |  Inbox |  Address Book |  My Subscription |  My Forums 

Photo Gallery |  Member List |  Search |  Calendars |  FAQ |  TOS |  Disclaimer |  Ticket List |  Log Out | 

Forum Software © ASPPlayground.NET Advanced Edition 2.5 ANSI